Talk:Wolfe cycle

Peer Review
I think the bulk of your article is really good and explains the pathway well!

Here are 2 suggestions that you can consider:

- Adding an image of the pathway or even just a diagram with arrows showing the intermediates. This can help readers visualize it and understand it more than just reading it in words. (Although I'm not sure what the Wikipedia guidelines are for that.)

- Mentioning more about what this does for the archaea, or why it matters. Such as how the organism uses the methane that is created. Weber.cdeyoung (talk) 20:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Overall the article looked wonderful, super neutral and fact oriented, not trying to drive home any point. You had plenty of references that were cited correctly and were what I considered reliable sources. Furthermore, just like myself, you just need to add more content to your article. But truly a great start. I also would have to agree an image of the pathway would be a great idea to build off of, its easier to flow then just being able to read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam micro (talk • contribs) 04:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)