Talk:Wolfenstein 3D/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I am nominating this article for a Good Article Reassessment for multiple reasons. The main issue the article has is its referencing issues as there are citations needed in parts of it, along with unreferenced paragraphs in the article (Ex: second paragraph for "Controversy"). There are also some prose issues in it, which the article needs an overall copyedit. There are most likely other issues the article has but these are the ones that pop up to me so if anyone sees anymore, please mention them.

Also I am aware that User:Niemti is currently blocked from editing but hopefully someone else will be able to make necessary changes to the page. GamerPro64 23:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I may try to help out tomorrow, as I'd like to take a little break from my Sonic characters and waiting on various reviews while still feeling productive. Most of what needs citations is Gameplay, which is a relief as those are easy to find. Tezero (talk) 23:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Likely bad refs:, , "Andy Slaven (2002), Video Game Bible, 1985–2002". These should either be removed, or justified. --Odie5533 (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I have this GAR on my watchlist. ) }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 22:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)


 * So its been been over two weeks since this review started and only two edits were made to the article. I don't believe that is enough to have this article sustain its GA status so I am now closing this review and demoting it to C class. GamerPro64  18:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)