Talk:Wolverton–Newport Pagnell line/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Comments: I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The lead of the article is very short, Per WP:LEAD, the lead is supposed to be a sufficient summary of what is presented in the article.
 * 2) Citations should not be in the lead.
 * 3) What is LNWR an abbreviation for? This should be indicated.
 * 4) "The canal closed in 1864.[1] Despite this, the railway when built did not run on the line of the old canal.[1]": If both sentences use the same source, it only needs to be indicated once.
 * 5) "4 mi" should have the adjective parameter on.
 * 6) In sentence "The water supply for locomotives at Wolverton was insufficient, so a water column was built at the intermediate station of Bradwell.", "of" should be "in".
 * 7) In sentence "Water came from the town's own supply, with many houses losing their supply.", you use "supply" twice. Can more variety in wording be used?
 * 8) Combine the sentences "Despite this, the LNWR considered electrification of the line in 1904, believing such a scheme would bring about considerable savings. The idea never materialised."
 * 9) Are there any historical picutures of the railroad that can be added to the article?
 * I can't really think of anything else to put in the lead. Also, what do you mean by 'adjective parameter' for the convert template? I can't find any images either.  Oliver Fury, Esq. message  •  contributions  23:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Since the major issues have been resolved, I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 00:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)