Talk:Women's National Anti-Suffrage League

Merge discussion
The two articles cover the same organisation from all appearances. Surely this is an obvious case for merging?Autarch (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Oppose I think that the female opposition to suffrage is a topic which deserves special treatment. It is intuitively obvious why large numbers of men would oppose universal suffrage, much less so why large numbers of women would. If the articles remain seperate, it is more likely that some historian will come along and explain it. BillMasen (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Comment Perhaps these articles need to be rewritten to make the differences and relationship clearer.Autarch (talk) 13:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC) ""Comment"" hopefully the expanded history of the ""Women's Anti Suffrage League"" will make this clearer - it was an actual/separate organisation, so warrants an entry as such. I'm hoping to check links and clarify entries re our holdings at The Women's Library London which should help - but it may take me some time (talk) Nov 2010