Talk:Women for the Wall

Explain ADVERT tag
This article is miles away from satisfying the rule that Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view. I also challenge it on grounds of conflict of interest. It is obviously written by someone associated with the organization for the purpose of promoting the organization. The promotion is open and blatant, without a single word of dissent. This is unacceptable and the article will be proposed for deletion if this problem is not fixed. Zerotalk 14:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Dear Zero

I have no connection whatsoever with the W4W group, and in good faith tried to write a balanced article. Please feel free to make changes in the article and air your concerns.Becky613 (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't see the problem. This article is the direct counterpart of Women of the Wall and is written in the same style.  Both articles represent the two sides of the discussion with Judaism of changing traditional attitudes towards how women pray at Judaism's Holy Site.  Women of the Wall of the represents the liberal view.  Women for the Wall represents the conservative view.  I would think that both articles would benefit from context in their lede paragraph. -Historian2 (talk) 06:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * "Written the same style", are you kidding? Women of the Wall is full of third-party sources and a large fraction, maybe more than half, consists of critique.  Did you read it?  In contrast, this article is almost entirely based on first-party sources plus the words of some admirers.  Barely a single dissenting word.  I accept Becky613's word that she is not an official spokesperson, but the rest of my criticism remains true.  It is a advertisement and not an encyclopedia article. Zerotalk 07:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I did read both articles, and for an article just published, I think its a good start. -Historian2 (talk) 07:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

POV issues
Article seems to be mostly a summary of 2013 opinion articles by group members. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)