Talk:Women in the yellow vests movement

Orphaned references in Women in the yellow vests movement
Lol, wtf is this? How is this different from the other Yellow Vest wiki page, other than the fact it only talks about the women in the campaign? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.55.7 (talk) 04:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Women in the yellow vests movement's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AI": From Amnesty International:  From Yellow vests movement:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Use of grammar tense
"They also sit at an intersection of many past feminist critiques of problems facing women." Is the use of the present tense here justified? I guess, it can be if it means the movement in general, but was this really the intention of the writer? Or should it be just the past tense like elsewhere in the article?--Adûnâi (talk) 03:46, 12 June 2019 (UTC)