Talk:Wonder Bar

WP:FILMS B class assessment review
A request has been made to determine if this article meets the B-class criteria for WP:FILMS. Looking over the article, at this time it does not meet the criteria. The article will require further expansion as well as additional sourcing to advance to B-class. For what needs to be done to reach the next assessment level click on the "[show]" button in the above film banner and follow the instructions in "Start to B-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films". Once the article meets the criteria, please relist your request for reassessment and I'll be happy to take a look. If you have any questions or need help with anything let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 19:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The article still doesn't meet the criteria. Coverage is limited to "plot" and "controversy", and is largely unsourced. PC78 (talk) 07:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your re-evaluation. I'll work on citations when I get a chance. Can you perhaps give a little more detail in what you would like to see improved in terms of coverage? I'm perhaps feeling that there isn't too much information out there on the film, as it is a minor blip in the overall history of film, but the quality of the article isn't meant to be dependent on the amount of information on the topic but on how thoroughly the topic is covered. Do you have any suggestions for starting points that I should look into a bit more? Thanks for your time and input! Sevey13 (talk) 07:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)


 * How would you distinguish "the amount of information on the topic" from "how thoroughly the topic is covered"? That's just two different ways of saying the same thing. You could expand the plot summary a bit (but not too much), add a cast list, find some sources to support the "Music and controversy" section. Have you tried searching for information about the film? I've managed to find and, both of them reliable sources with some good, usable content. Best of luck in improving the article. :) PC78 (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)