Talk:Woodhaven Boulevard station (IND Queens Boulevard Line)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 01:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing later, as part of WikiCup 2017.  Sounder Bruce  01:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * The lead section does not suinclude a summary of the station's history section.
 * Done. epicgenius (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * Some paragraphs in the history and layout sections have too many inline sources (the general rule-of-thumb is three at most) that need to be either spread out to other sentences or removed.
 * I've dispersed the sources. Most sentences now have up to four sources, which should be bundled shortly. epicgenius (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * The list of bus routes is completely unreferenced and the operator column in particular seems OR-ish, if not unnecessarily detailed.
 * I've added references. epicgenius (talk) 02:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * I'm not sure that we need two bus pictures, as it makes the section too small on lower resolution displays. A picture of an in-use station entrance would be nice as well, but is not necessary for this review.
 * Removed the Q29 one. epicgenius (talk) 02:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There is already an image of a station entrance. (Two of the other three are also in the middle of nowhere.) epicgenius (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A few nitpicks and this one is good to go.  Sounder Bruce  02:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * I'm not sure that we need two bus pictures, as it makes the section too small on lower resolution displays. A picture of an in-use station entrance would be nice as well, but is not necessary for this review.
 * Removed the Q29 one. epicgenius (talk) 02:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There is already an image of a station entrance. (Two of the other three are also in the middle of nowhere.) epicgenius (talk) 15:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A few nitpicks and this one is good to go.  Sounder Bruce  02:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * A few nitpicks and this one is good to go.  Sounder Bruce  02:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the comprehensive review. I will fix these issues over the next few days. epicgenius (talk) 02:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * All the issues are fixed now. epicgenius (talk) 15:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing those issues. I will pass this nomination.  Sounder Bruce  03:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)