Talk:Woodlark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 12:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, before I review this article in depth, here are some essential issues at first glance. FunkMonk (talk) 12:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Sources need to be added after each paragraph. As of now, many sentences end without citation.
 * The article is on the short side, but I'm sure more info could be squeezed out of the sources? It is not as if this is a largely unknown, remotely living bird.
 * The description section seems a bit lacking. I can see many distinct features just on the images that are not mentioned in the text.
 * The section could also use discussion of what differences there are between the subspecies.
 * Taxonomy section is almost completely devoid of taxonomic info. Who described it, does it have junior synonyms? What are its relatives?
 * this may help with the last two points, and this is the original placement in the genus Alauda Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Anyone there? FunkMonk (talk) 17:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No response, failed. FunkMonk (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)