Talk:Woods of Ypres

Fair use rationale for Image:Woods of Ypres-logo.png
Image:Woods of Ypres-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability
Re PROD removal & delinking:
 * 1) This band lacks notability and has been tagged as such for a long time. It  will  shortly  be PRODed again.
 * 2) Members of a band, even a notable one,  are not  de facto notable. It  is therefore  unlikely  that  a Wikipedia article will created about  them. Red links removed. --Kudpung (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You cannot prod articles after they've been de-prodded; take it to AfD. Ironholds (talk) 07:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)