Talk:Woodside Primary School, Grays

I have reverted the redirect pending further discussion. Simply changing the page to a redirect means a large quantity of material is lost. In addition, its not clear (to me) why someone looking for Woodside school should be redirected to the article on Grays. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 08:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with you. Colonel Warden (talk) 01:30, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Me too. A redirect should never be used for a delete.   D r e a m Focus  16:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

AFD result
The AFD result was merge. User:Deor has redirected the page to Thurrock which effectively deletes the page before the merge is completed. The redirect serves no useful purpose since there is so little information about Woodside on the Thurrock page. The notice fixed by User:Black Kite said "If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger ..." There remains a great deal of material to be merged. I therefore propose to undo the redirect, but will wait a while to allow comments. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 07:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ignore the above - I now see how to access the history. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 07:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

change of redirect
I have changed this to the Woodside school section of Little Thurrock. I know this has not been discussed and conflicts somewhat with the AFD decision, but it seems to me to make more sense to have the material specific to Woodside in the Little Thurrock article rather than in the Thurrock article where it would be grossly disproportionate. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)