Talk:Woody Brown (surfer)

SpeedyDelete
as requested by speedydelete tag, here is a copy of relevant discussion elsewhere:


 * Hmm. Well, it appears that due to me being in the middle of synching 4 articles (original, new, moved original, and disambiguation), I accidentally wrote over your speedy delete [{hoax}] tag via the miracle of copypaste of my offline text, not expecting changes in a new minor article in under a minute.
 * Please reinsert it if you think it appropriate.
 * I would ask, though, that you first consult this weekend's Financial Times (which was explicitly referenced), wherein the subject of this article was the featured Obituary. The Financial Times has a better record for solid journalism than even the Wall Street Journal. While no newspaper is immune to hoaxing (the Hitler Diaries spring to mind), I would suggest that in this case it is extremely unlikely.


 * Sorry if I CSD'ed your article accidentally. It just smelled funny, and I move fast... Z i g g y   S a w  d u s t  00:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Heh. No worries. There's a strong tendency on wikipedia nowadays to do the same, an unfortunate focussing on meta-information rather than actual content. I've just recently had an editor waving The Rules at me on another article because he'd only read the discussion not the article (and had mis-read even the discussion), and even when I'd reminded him of THE Rules he went off on another non-article-related tangent. You're doing blddoy well if you've realised a hair-trigger mistake with the same hair-trigger speed. I'm pretty close to giving up on wikipedia due to the rise of the self-appointed yet dissociated Gatekeeper Class and the tremendous damage they're doing to wikipedia, but it's the showing-through of people like yourself that restore the spirit. Thank you. Saltation (talk) 00:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * oh by the bye: i accidentally overwrote your DIEDIEDIE tag and i gave up on the myriad changing flavours of wikipedia Bureaucracy Du Jour quite a while back -- do i need to add anything to the article for the SpeedyDelete boys now homing in on it or not?  Saltation (talk) 01:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * answer: no: all resolved now. Saltation (talk) 21:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Hershoff Patents
This seems to be quite tangential to the subject of the article. Even the citation includes "invented" because it's obvious that Hershoff was merely describing the design of the voyaging boats used by Polynesians and Hawaiians for hundreds of years previously. So, not only is it tangential, it is misleading. If for some reason we were to go into who *really* invented the catamaran would would have to credit it as being an indigenous design of the people of the South Pacific.

I feel the preceding paragraph stands very well on it's own and should remain, but I intend to delete the Hershoff one as tangential and misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C2:4C01:2BC9:5C76:7AE8:1CF5:7F8D (talk) 18:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)