Talk:Woolmer Hill School

Hang-on
I agree that there is promotional drivel in here but this is a valid subject, being a secondary school. Please give me a few minutes to despam it. Thanks. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Done now. Thanks. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your edit in 2010. Since 2010 a few contraventions of 'peacock' promotional terms were inserted relying on subsequent Ofsted reports, notably the selective excerpts at the headline section of those reports.  Those inserting new editors are welcome for their assistance however need to carefully consider what wikipedia is not, WP:EDITORIAL and WP:NPOV.  By including the first four or five points of a robust and yet generally positive section of the report, namely 'Teaching', the consulting audience of wikipedia has the professional published data there and the statements will not amount to opinion or original research.-  Adam37   Talk  16:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)