Talk:Worcester Park House

Untitled
There is a lot more work to be done in cataloguing this house. The site is all but lost, but records must remain somewhere. Fiddle Faddle 19:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * But is this article drawn from external sources - or is it original research ? -- Beardo (talk) 04:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, you probably have to look at the external sources in the list, don't you. They are scarce, and there is no argument that the article needs improvement.  Nonetheless it is notable and verifiable.  Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

1607?
Why do all the visible sources give a build date of 1795/1797, two centuries later? Is this the same house? A later build of a same-named house? For an article having to prove its notability at all, this seems like a problem. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


 * It is not uncommon for houses to be rebuilt more than once on broadly the same footprint and to use the same name. One only has to look at relatively recent fires in UK National Trust properties to start to wonder when the current version of the property was really built. There is no quarrel with the fact that the article needs improvement, though. Fiddle   Faddle  21:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)