Talk:Workers Solidarity Movement

60 activists?
I can think of lots of Irish groups with hundreds of members who wouldn't qualify for wikipedia on the grounds of notability. Shouldn't it be Workers' and not Workers?86.42.219.131 (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Having lots of members is best thought of a sufficient, rather than necessary condition for notability, if that.
 * Notability on Wikipedia is judged by significant coverage in reliable sources; a quick Google News/Books/Scholar search shows there's plenty of that.
 * The official website omits the apostrophe.
 * Hope this helps, Skomorokh  05:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Criticism section
An anonymous editor keeps re-inserting the claim that one of WSM's members was treated in a mental hospital. Before this information goes back in again, I'd be interested in knowing the editor's source for this, as well as a reason why this should be considered notable information, or included in the "Criticism" section. -Father Inire (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The frequent reverts of and by this particularly persistent anon make up the bulk of this article's edit history. I propose we have it semi-protected for a while. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Second, can you get this proposed / enacted? Fifelfoo (talk) 22:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Third. Apart from anything else, I'd like to hear a non-ableist rationale for why the fact of anarchists being human beings existing in a society rife with oppression and contradictions and therefore prone like other human beings in such a society to struggling with their health should be considered a "criticism". 86.168.119.34 (talk) 04:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)