Talk:Working America

Membership figures
First, changing the membership figures would require a citation to a reliable published source. Second, the change to the paragraph on where membership stood in 2005 is outright inappropriate. That is a historical statement which is sourced by citation. Changing it makes the paragraph say something the citation does not say; worse, it makes a 2005 citation talk about 2007 membership figures! That's patent nonsense (a big Wiki no-no). Third, sources published in early August 2007 show that Working America only has 1.6 million members, so the 2 million member claim would be outrageously incorrect. - Tim1965 20:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * New info sense that time: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122333633242509583.html lots of good info to update the article. I only updated membership counts. 12.4.17.88 (talk) 19:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You could update the whole article. I've been working on other articles. - Tim1965 (talk) 22:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)