Talk:Working group/Archives/2014

Irrelevant Click Through
I have been sent here from a discussion of html, and foolishly expected to be told what the "html working group" is. My bad: I should have noticed that just "working group" was the item underlined. Can I be excused on the grounds that a reasonable person would think this a quite inane item to selected as an html anchor, while any editor with even a scintilla of mother wit might have seen the notion that there is such a thing as an html working group, or more likely The HTML Working Group, as worthy of a click-through footnote? DavidLJ (talk) 00:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)