Talk:World Resources Institute

Contested deletion
--What a bunch of shit. This is without a doubt the worst pile of steaming propaganda I've ever seen on Wikipedia.--- This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I'm in the process of trying to salvage content from an article with a 10-year history that has been deleted twice now because copyvio material was added. Guettarda (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't know if it should be deleted, but as currently constituted the article reads like a press release. If it's a placeholder while a more eXtensive article is being developed, there should be some way of noting that . . . DoctorFun1970 (talk) 10:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Clearly shocking style, including the use of "we". But WRI is a significant organization and has been for several decades.  The article can readily be brought to the minimum standard for notability and given a good copy-edit.  I haven't time but someone will.  Best wishes.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * It is possible something can be made out of this article about an American think-tank. most the content was a close copy of a number of press releases, and full of external links, I have removed the worst offending material. Dysklyver  15:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Have made several improvements to language neutrality, objectivity, and style. More remains to be done, but at this point I would argue that this article is no longer excessively outside of standard Wikipedia quality. Jon rainheart (talk) 19:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)