Talk:World music/Archives/2020

This needs to be an article, and by the name World Music
This is in response to the above discussions plus a recent attempt to move the article. The term "World Music" is widely used and has extensive wp:notability. Yes, the term can be problematic, inconsistent and confusing, but that is more reason to cover it rather than a reason to not cover it. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

I think there should be more direct mention of the view that it's problematic and the reasons, but apart from that I think it's fine, and if everyone stopped using the term tomorrow it would still warrant an article on what was a thing for several decades (essentially a marketing thing, but I think the article achieves a reasonable balance of making it clear that it's a marketing thing without being too sniffy about it) Scatterkeir (talk) 00:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on World music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314022819/http://worldmusic.nationalgeographic.com/view/page.basic/genre/content.genre/world_fusion_800/en_US to http://worldmusic.nationalgeographic.com/view/page.basic/genre/content.genre/world_fusion_800/en_US

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)