Talk:Worldline SA

Possible page move?
What would you say to moving this page to Worldline (company)? As you mentioned here, all of the incoming links for Worldline refer to the concept in physics, and it should probably redirect to World line. I think the French company is notable, however, despite its enwiki article being created by a paid editor; I'd like to see a discussion at AfD if you are concerned about notability. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Also pinging, since they initially marked this page as reviewed. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with Lord Bolingbroke's suggestion. I've also slapped on a COI tag, as the article has a few non-neutral bits that could use further attention, as well as the overcitation. signed,Rosguill talk 06:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't really care if the company page exists or not and won't AfD it myself. I saw a term with 13700 Google scholar hits being repurposed by a paid editor, and perhaps reacted too harshly. Probably should have just moved it myself. Moving the page to Worldline (company) will remove my objection, but note the previous AfDs (1 2). Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Looking at the deleted revisions, the sourcing has been significantly improved since last time, and given the high proportion of French-language coverage, I'm not terribly surprised that people failed to find sources in prior discussions signed,Rosguill talk 20:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello everyone, I created this page, I understand to change its name to Worldline (company) and thank you for the action as I don't want to disturb the redirection to the World line physics term. Please tell me if I can improve something.