Talk:Worldview and working model of neuro-linguistic programming

I do not see how this can be defended as a separate article from the main article on NLP--except to the extent that it contains extensive quotations and impressionistic lists that don't belong anywhere in Wikipedia. I'm proposing a merge. Just as Principles of NLP was merged to it, so should this. DGG (talk) 21:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Good suggestion, agree. Poltair (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * This article doesn't belong in Wikipedia. It's an impressionistic and biased description, not written in NPOV. The referencing is just impressionistic and pretentious nonsense: probably a trick to make it (the article) last longer as a Wikipdia article. Who can one complain to? Articles like this give Wikpedia a bad name. Reinhard, London —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.26.14 (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)