Talk:Worship Music (album)

Tracks
Based on what I've heard about the new album, I don't think these tracks are correct. Tetsuo669 (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

According to metalhammer.co.uk/news/exclusive-hammer-hears-new-anthrax-tracks/ here are the confirmed tracks (so far):


 * Burn The Past
 * Earth On Hell
 * New Noise
 * Bleed

Chart Positions
here --L1A1 FAL (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Good source, but what is needed is links to the actual charts they represent so peak position can be charted. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

There is no source that says Dan Nelson wrote any songs on the record. The record only credits the band. The article should only state what the record says unless there's a source to show otherwise. http://www.herfitzpr.com/hpr.com/Anthrax_Worship_Music_CD_Credits.html - this has the credits from inside the album. 12.16.164.205 (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you had actually commented when you reverted, this problem wouldn't have happened. A reliable source should have been requested at the time that it was added. Yours isn't a reliable source, but http://www.allmusic.com/album/worship-music-mw0000819619/credits is, and Nelson isn't listed. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Since when is the US copyright office not a reliable source? Needtaknow123 (talk) 01:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Dan Nelson writing credits
It doesn't seem as though Nelson has been granted credits only that he is in the process of suing for those credits. If anyone has a more clear reference than what is in the article, that would be appreciated. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Link to the copyrights for Worship Music clearly showing Dan Nelson as a coauthor on 8 tracks. Case was settled in Nelson's favor June 23rd, 2012. Thank you.

http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=1&ti=1,1&Search%5FArg=Anthrax%20worship%20music&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=Uedrxru_9RpC8YeI9jaz_2KVH-gr&SEQ=20130620102412&SID=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needtaknow123 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Also, here is the link clearly stating that the case was settled last year. Thank you.

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/anthrax-settles-lawsuit-with-former-singer-dan-nelson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needtaknow123 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Needtaknow123 (talk) 01:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I have to make a personal comment: Needtaknow123, do you know how to read English? The reason I ask is that there's a big edit notice on my page, "If you're here to tell me about an edit of yours that I reverted, please explain why it should be included on the article's talk page" yet you kept writing me on my talk page. And then above, I requested "a more clear reference than what is in the article".
 * The reference you have provided in the article and again here, the US Copyright Catalog (1978 to present), is not clear as to whether Nelson has or has not won the suit as it clearly states: "Copyright Claimant" but below "Authorship on Application". So a link to the case, or a notice of settlement or a write-up about this would be better. In short, your source is not sufficiently clear and we need a better one. So please stop beating this dead horse with this ineffective stick and start reading.
 * And do sign your comments with ~ Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The blabbermouth.net article is sufficiently clear. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, sorry I wasn't well versed enough in the realm of Wikipedia. Peace. Needtaknow123 (talk) 01:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Worship Music (album) → Worship Music – I noticed that the title "Worship Music" is a redirect to a completely different subject. Вик Ретлхед (talk) 08:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The common term is Christian worship music not this album. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - The articles are entitled "Contemporary worship music" and "Contemporary worship", while the term "Worship Music" is a disambiguation page. I think the readers can easily make difference between those terms.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course you support it, you nominated the move. The question isn't what those articles are called but what the primary term, "worship music", refers to. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose - leave as is, CAPS is not sufficient disambiguation in this case when this genre is, rightly or wrongly, often capitalized (example Continuum Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World 2012 capitalizes Contemporary Worship Music, just as it captializes Rhythm & Blues and Rock n Roll). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - the disambiguation page is necessary; this page is by no means the primary topic. StAnselm (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Nominator's preference is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and the disambiguation page for such an ambiguous phrase is entirely appropriate per WP:TWODABS. Even an unreliable indicator like a google test establishes that the album is no where near the top of search results. Bad nomination.--ColonelHenry (talk) 23:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Ditto StAnselm and ColonelHenry. Evensteven (talk) 00:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose The disambiguation page at the base title is the correct approach, as the genre of music is much more notable than the single album. Xoloz (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose Although I would like to see the disambig page have other forms of worship music added. There can't be only contemp. Xian? --Richhoncho (talk) 11:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.