Talk:Worsley/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 20:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Initial review
Not at all bad for a "Start-class" article. Should make GA-class, although that [clarification] flag will need urgent attention; and, as per Eccles, Greater Manchester, we aught to have a "climate" section.


 * I have removed the clarification request and the uncertain text that lead to it. The source offers no more information that could help, so I've placed a request on the talk page just in case someone knows for sure. Parrot of Doom (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I will put the article On Hold whilst these are addressed; but I will carry on with the review anyway.Pyrotec (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Climate data isn't available for the settlement per se, but a sentence could be added that Eccles has a similar climate to the rest of Greater Manchester and add some data from the Ringway weather station. Would that be enough? Nev1 (talk) 20:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, OK by me.Pyrotec (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Done, on both articles. Nev1 (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

GA review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This is possibly a good contender for WP:FAC. I don't particularly like the WP:lead, but its adequate and I'm awarding GA-status now. Congratulations on the article.Pyrotec (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)