Talk:Worst Episode Ever/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  16:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Wiklink first mention of Comic Book Guy in lead
 * Wikilink The Android Dungeon in lead
 * Sentences with quotes need citations
 * LA Times, Seattle Times are italicized
 * Wikilink IGN in ref
 * Ref 12: use consistent date formatting

On hold for seven days while above minor issues get addressed.  R uby2010  comment!  20:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * All done! Thanks for the review. Theleftorium (talk) 21:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks great. Pass for GA.  R uby2010   comment!  21:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)