Talk:Wraparound (video games)

rename to wraparound (gaming)
Since this concept isn't just limited to video games, but also appears in some board games, I think a rename is appropriate. &mdash;Eekerz (t) 12:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 18 October 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Wraparound (video games) → Wraparound (gaming) – concept is not just limited to video games; see talk page&#32;Hank Benson (talk) 12:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – Ammarpad (talk) 06:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The article as it reads today makes no mention of non-video game usage. The talk page comment you are referring to dates back to 2010, with no discussion since. 162 etc. (talk) 15:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Not sure it counts as discussion in 2010, but this should probably go to WP:RM as per WP:PCM. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose Video Game is the standard disambiguation for all video-game related articles. This is chosen based on the most notable form of the media, which in this instance, is the video game(s) PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. This is still most prominent in video games. J I P  &#124; Talk 13:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE  16:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose - unless the article can be expanded, changing the scope to gaming would only serve to confuse any reader who looks for the non-video game content. ASUKITE  16:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose Topic is entirely defined and sourced in the context of video games. No sourcing or context is proposed for other uses, and such could be a minor mention without the topic being renamed besides. You've misread the topic, this isn't about an individual video game. -- ferret (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I did indeed, oops. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Makes no sense
The 'Impact' section in this article looks like it was written by chat GPT. The points about enhanced immersion and exploration are nonsensical. 71.86.200.185 (talk) 00:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)