Talk:WrestleMania XI/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I may as well review this article, as now I know the story! Looking through it now it looks fine. I will review it more closely and add comments. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 00:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC) This is all I can find. I did a little copy editing. The article looks very good. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 02:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Tim White needs disambiguation.

I fixed the wikilink. Thanks for pointing it out. I should have realized that it was a common name. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): It is well written b (MoS):No obvious MoS error detected
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Article is appropriately referenced b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): The references appear reliable
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Covers the entire event b (focused): Remains focused on topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:Is neutral
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Good job on this article, once again. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 02:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)