Talk:Wulf Barsch

Untitled
I looked up this page on a whim. It is so rife with inaccuracies that it is painful. I am tempted just to delete the entire article and start over.

His birth name is wrong. His birth place is wrong. Even the spelling of "Kandinsky" is wrong. And he did not study under Klee or Kandinsky. They were dead. He studied under Masters who had studied under Klee and Kandinsky.

Here is what I am going to do. I AM GOING TO CORRECT THIS ARTICLE. Since it is already incredibly poorly sourced, at this point I am just going to make wholesale corrections. I will provide proper citation later.

I am going out on a bit of a limb here because the information I am going to provide is information which is already in my head. I will make corrections only if I am 100% certain of them. The citations are, I know, out there, because I've read the material. For the person who added the brief Meridian piece:

Meridian did a HUGE (not entirely accurate) article on Wulf quite some time ago.

Wulf Barsch is my uncle. Ours is a small family; I know him well.Samantha1961 (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth, the current incarnation has the artist's personal seal of approval as to accuracy. I will be working to flesh it out after the holidays and hopefully start adding citations even sooner.Samantha1961 (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * thank-you very much. artists are a notorious problem due to  wiki-bias. i changed prix de rome to rome prize which i believe is correct (although some sources say the other way, it is confused with the French one), and will add some inline refs.  Accotink2  talk 17:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Dude, Being his nephew doesn't make you God. Shut up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.97.2 (talk) 21:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been reverted by a bot to as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)