Talk:Wycombe Railway

Merger proposal
We have two articles which clearly cover the same subject, see WP:CFORK; I don't see why two are required. I suggest that Wycombe Railway Company, being the smaller article and also the one with the fewer links, be merged into this article. Whilst there are several discrepancies, these should be easily resolved by examination of the cited references. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed as per nom. Not notable enough to warrant its own page. Lamberhurst (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Support There is a great deal of overlap: any information in Wycombe Railway Company that isn't duplicated can be merged in Hertzsprung (talk) 20:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Wycombe Railway Co. has less text and Wycombe Railway is a better overall name. Eldumpo (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Redrose64 (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Underbridge v overbridge
Surely the railway would pass over an underbridge and under an overbridge. As it stands the article doesn't make sense. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ Agree; have transposed them, and also linked the first instance of each term to a suitable definition for those still confused. -- Red rose64 (talk) 10:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wycombe Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091223103017/http://www.broadgauge.org.uk/oldsite/history/line-wycombe.html to http://www.broadgauge.org.uk/oldsite/history/line-wycombe.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)