Talk:Wynnea americana/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Very good! Just one thing to deal with: When/why/how between 1905 to 1946 did it go from Midiotis to Wynnea? Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * My bad! I had the synonymy mixed up: Midotis americana was a different species named by Thaxter, now known as Furia americana. Our Wynnea americana has no synonym. Good you brought that up! Sasata (talk) 06:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Good... quick and easy! Rcej (Robert) - talk 01:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Wynnea americana passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: