Talk:Wynton Kelly/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 18:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

: The article seems to comply with MOS guidelines on prose and grammar, as well as general layout. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 06:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: I'm actually quite pleased by the large and well-used quantity of reliable, published sources cited in this article! I don't see any original research incorporated into the text, either. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 06:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article looks like it covers all required aspects of the topic, and nothing seems crufty or excessive. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 06:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. With the below discussions resolved, I'm confident that this article checks out for neutrality. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC) . Immediate revision history shows good stability over the past few months. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 02:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC) : The article does not currently feature any images, so we might as well say that it passes on this one. As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 02:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)


 * Note: I know it's been a while since I've worked on this review, but I'll need a few more days before I can get back to it. Spring in Wikipedia&#39;s lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 09:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ok. I'll be around. EddieHugh (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm back at last, and I intend to see this review through now. :) Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 05:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments

 * "He is known for his lively, blues-based playing and as one of the finest accompanists in jazz." Is that bit about being considered "one of the finest accompanists" as neutral as it could be? The use of words might not be a big NPOV deal in this case, or it might be; my proverbial radar picked up on it, so I'd like to make sure. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 05:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It's uncontroversial. Further examples: here, here ("Kelly was renowned as an accompanist"), and here. The last is a blog, but mostly quotes specific sources. So, I think that it is NPOV; it's just that the points of view of the sources are so positive!


 * Thanks for the review. I cut the "album" you added to the lead as that word already appears in that sentence. EddieHugh (talk) 10:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Well then, the article checks out! I apologize once again for the long wait. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)