Talk:Wyntoon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrison49 21:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * There is good prose throughout.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * The article has a good layout.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * The article is well referenced.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Sources used are reliable.
 * C. No original research:
 * There does not appear to be any original research.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article retains a neutral point of view.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are all freely licensed in the public domain with the exception of one fair use image with the correct licence.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Captions are succinct and informative.
 * 1) Overall: A very interesting read. Harrison49 (talk) 21:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: