Talk:XACML

Moved Obligations out of the "New in XACML 3.0" section, since Obligations have been in XACML long before. 94.136.86.20 (talk) 15:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Ground-breaking work
"The implementation of delegation is new in XACML 3.0, following ground-breaking work by Butler Lampson and a number of other successful research projects which prototyped the concept" - the cited reference is from 1991. The statement is a bit misleading, and it's not quite clear what exactly they prototyped. --JensMueller (talk) 09:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

As the citation appears irrelevant here (XACML did not exist in 1991) I would suggest that this citation is removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.154.222.237 (talk) 06:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

A simple description
This subject needs a simple description added for the less technical people looking for a an answer to "what is it??" Back ache (talk) 11:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

External Links section
This section misses a number of XACML compliant products, e.g. ObjectSecurity OpenPMF (www.openpmf.com)75.61.130.18 (talk) 04:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Examples can be misunderstood
Using intuitive language to describe the XACML examples conceals the fact that XACML is a highly complex format and language - better show the full XACML file that implements each of the example.75.61.130.18 (talk) 04:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Time-based Authorization in XACML
AnyOf seems not right when a time frame is given as a requirement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.111.105.94 (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Not a manual
Did a bold cleanup, Wikipedia is not a tech manual. Rm unsourced material. Add formatting.  // Timothy :: talk  06:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, you deleted a lot of relevant content that I spent years putting together. I do not understand why history, architecture, and design have been removed for XACML but are still very much present on other pages like OAuth and SAML. David (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * As a result another user came in and added the details you had removed but made mistakes. Rules cannot contain multiple conditions. This is horrendous. David (talk) 17:26, 25 October 2023 (UTC)