Talk:XAMPP

Impartiality
Article reads like advertising. Vapourmile (talk) 17:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

stub entry
worked on a stub entry for this program. --Xanthar 00:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Sweet, when did Apache, MySQL, PHP, Perl become operating systems? This is worded horribly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.9.22.130 (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

XAMPP is certainly worthy of an entry on Wikipedia SciberDoc (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Security
There needs to be a security section in the article: Are there any disadvantages to using XAMPP as a production server? If one enables the security of xampp is it then the same as a standard install of Apache, Mysql, Php and Perl? What security settings are there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.221.71 (talk) 18:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Development
We should also note in this article, Are there any disadvantages to using XAMPP for developing PHP/MySQL applications? Lightning Thundercat (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Components table on Windows
The Components table on this page appears to indicate that XAMPP on Windows does not come with any PHP extensions, but I just installed XAMPP 5.6.40, and phpinfo indicates that it comes with curl, mcrypt and many other extensions... Can someone check the table? --IByte (talk) 11:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Pronunciation change?
At the time of posting, the official page has a YouTube video embedded that seems to imply the name should be said like "shamp"? Not sure if it's worth updating the pronunciation page to match. Apparently Wikipedia doesn't like using the youtube URL that doesn't drop a cookie, weird, let me try this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6DEDm7C37A Wardrich (talk) 14:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)