Talk:XHLNC-FM

Treaty violations
Are there any credible sources about the treaty violations. I've found this but it looks like its credibility is questionable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rsduhamel (talk • contribs) 06:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC).

XHLNC vs. KPFK
Is San Diego actually considered part of KPFK's market? Seems a long way for an FM signal. I think the real issue must be that XHLNC's signal cuts down on KPFK's fringe areas, at least to the south of Los Angeles (where KPFK is). No? Jeh 20:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Correct, XHLNC on 90.7 only affects KPFK in San Diego county, where KPFK does not have a legal coverage right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.57.150 (talk) 15:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

International notification
Near as I can tell, this 104.9 facility has never been officially notified to the United States under the treaty. FCC records show an operating facility at Mexicali, and an allotment at Ensenada, neither of which matches this station. 121a0012 (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)