Talk:Xalapa/GA1

Good Article review
I am providing this review here, since a formal GA was never started. Please follow the instructions at WP:GAN for any future GA nomination.

This article does not yet meet GA criteria for the following reasons:
 * References are still missing in most sections. Every place where there is a hard fact (e.g. statistic, number, date, etc.), a citation to a Reliable Source must be provided, per WP:V.
 * Images need to follow the guidelines at WP:MOSIMAGE. Further, it's best if the images are not hard-sized and if they are, they should not hard-sized smaller than 300px.
 * Lists, with the exception of sister cities, should be reworked into readable prose. The list of notable people should also include references verifying each person's notability.
 * You may want to consider breaking the article down into sub-articles per WP:SUMMARY

Please submit for GA nomination again when ready. Best, epicAdam(talk) 18:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)