Talk:Xanthostemon chrysanthus

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Xanthostemon chrysanthus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130616062342/http://asgap.org.au:80/x-chr.html to http://asgap.org.au/x-chr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision of 17 May 2023
@Mat Kiyan I have reverted the two edits you made today on this article - the second one you did was a reiteration of an existing statement in the "Cultivation" section so it was not needed. The first edit you made has a question mark hanging over it, as Plants of the World Online, Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants, and the Australasian Virtual Herbarium all disagree with it. Given that the cited source is a 'newsletter' and not a professionally written paper, I chose to remove it. That's not to say that the claim is incorrect - just that it needs a better citation. If you can find one please feel free to make a new edit to the article. Cheers, Steve Junglenut &#124;Talk 09:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! I don't know the FRIM web source has certain criteria or differences that qualify it as a newsletter? The content I read did not inform current activities of the institute (as I understand what a newsletter would do), but it just tells me briefly about the plants their scientists study? So I thought it might be OK to cite it here at the time.
 * Nevertheless, I trust you being more knowledgable than I am, and I understand the removal. I'll try to find more solid sources as you suggested the next time I edit the page, thank you for the feedback. - Mat Kiyan (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)