Talk:Xenogears/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Neutrality of certain sections is a problem, particularly in the Reception and Critical Response sections. The Characters section veers off topic and should be revised, as should the introduction's last paragraph (to meet MoS standards). Consider creating a more concise summary of the plot (back of the book style), or a more in-depth approach (possibly a sub-article) which could go into much more detail of the game's complex storyline. The very specific, yet incomprehensive plot summary given implies a series of disconnected events that misrepresents the game.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Drb021 (talk) 05:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)