Talk:Xenosaga Episode I/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheJoebro64 (talk · contribs) 20:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Never played a Xeno game. Happy to take a look. JOE BRO  64  20:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry I've taken a while on this. I'll finish the review by the end of the week. JOE  BRO  64  20:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Review
All done. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * IGN, GameSpot, GameSpy, RPGamer and Eurogamer should all be italicized, per Manual of Style/Titles.
 * The English voice cast also received mixed to positive comments from reviewers. "Mixed-to-positive" is considered an odd phrase that should be avoided, per VG article guidelines. I'd also expand upon what critics praised/criticized about the English voice cast.
 * Both Episode I and Episode II were remade for the Nintendo DS as Xenosaga I & II. "Re-imagined" might be a better phrase here, since this wasn't actually a full remake.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There are a few issues, but overall I think this is close to the GA criteria. Well done, ! JOE  BRO  64  20:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There are a few issues, but overall I think this is close to the GA criteria. Well done, ! JOE  BRO  64  20:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * There are a few issues, but overall I think this is close to the GA criteria. Well done, ! JOE  BRO  64  20:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Great! Happy to promote this now.  JOE  BRO  64  21:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)