Talk:Xerotyphlops vermicularis

Empty sections
Should we have empty sections in the article? Please discuss. --91.10.56.74 (talk) 20:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I already gave a justification for keeping empty sections, i.e., keeping the reference section in anticipation for references added in future edits.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * This is clearly not a topic for my talk page.
 * Your eagerness in reverting IPs obviously does cloud your power of perception. Take a look at what you actually reverted, then provide an explanation for that. --91.10.56.74 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And yet, you refuse to listen why empty reference sections should be kept on article pages.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have to conclude that you indeed have not checked what you actually reverted, and have no intention of doing so. --91.10.56.74 (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Waait, why did you change from "the reference section" (singular) to "reference sections" (plural)? Do you state that the case is identical for everything you removed? --91.10.56.74 (talk) 21:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * What makes you think that you can make me see the alleged errors of my ways by being rude and uncivil?--Mr Fink (talk) 21:38, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Please respond to my questions. --91.10.56.74 (talk) 21:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Could someone please point out where the alleged consensus regarding empty reference sections can be found? Thanks. --91.10.56.74 (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)