Talk:Xiangyan Temple

Requested move 14 November 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus that as this is the only contender currently on WP for this title, there is no need to disambiguate. If further articles are ever written, we can rethink. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 15:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Xiangyan Temple (Xichuan) → Xiangyan Temple – Only Xiangyan Temple with an article. Timmyshin (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Is it certain that the English book mentions all refer to this one and not the one in Liulin County? In ictu oculi (talk) 19:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I get over 1,000 ghits for Xiangyan Temple and they all seem relevant, and refer to many different localities. It seems unlikely that this particular temple is the primary topic for a name that is given to so many apparently notable temples. Andrewa (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * But we don't have articles for the other temples. How does the extra dab page help our readers? Timmyshin (talk) 04:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Support. This is the only subject with an article. Apparently only one other "Xiangyan Temple" is even mentioned on Wikipedia, and that can be distinguished as easily by a hat note as by an unnecessary dab page.--Cúchullain t/ c 18:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.