Talk:Yaanga/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ezlev (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this fascinating article! I've created two subsections below, one for GAProgress as an overview of the review's status and one for specific points to be raised and discussed. Any broader discussion can take place up here. Looking forward to working with you, ! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 00:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * , the work you've done looks great! Is the article ready for me to take another look? ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 23:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , thanks so much for your patience! I think I've dealt with the main points you raised now, so yes please take a look and advise.Vizjim (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * As far as I'm concerned,, this is a Good Article! Congrats! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Well written
Prose: Well done overall! MOS: Needs some work to follow MOS:LEDE.
 * The third paragraph of the "Location" section needs to be shortened and clarified.
 * Done
 * The article's conclusion is particularly well done – good job!
 * Citations in the lede should be moved into the body where possible, as should content from the lede.
 * Done
 * The lede should summarize the body of the article.
 * Done
 * Other MOS criteria for GA are met.

Verifiable
Reference style: Good! Reliable sources: Sourcing looks good. No original research: Free of copyvio:
 * The section beginning "The river continued to flow westward to Ballona Flats" and ending "north of present Boyle Heights" is unsourced.
 * Done
 * Earwig flags one WP:MIRROR, which isn't a problem.
 * Some of the long quotes from this source need to be incorporated into the text.
 * Done

Broad
Addresses main aspects: Looks like it! Stays focused: It does!

Neutral
Seems to neutrally reflect the sources.

Stable
It is!

Illustrated
Yep!

Final points
This looks fantastic,. A few final details: Just let me know one way or the other about these two things, and we'll be good to go! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 01:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The sentence "More than one history of Los Angeles makes claims that in the westward shift of the river in the flood of 1815, the river destroyed both the Natives' village as well as the recently established second pueblo settlement, including the pueblo chapel." Is this actually sourced to the ayuntamiento records, or does it need a citation to a different source for support?
 * I found a citation in Union Station (Los Angeles) for the Bernice Johnston quote and added it here, but it's incomplete – any chance you've got a link to the source, or more details about it?