Talk:Yahtzee

Minimum score
The "Minimum score" section stating that 6 is the minimum score is incorrect. There is no rule that actually forces you to score a five of a kind in the Yahtzee section; thus, one could potentially place five 1s in the Chance box, and score zero everywhere else, for a total score of 5. My pocket electronic Yahtzee game (made by MB) verifies this. John Darrow (talk) 06:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

This is quite correct, 5 is the minimum score.

Scoring statistics
It seems to me that the highest possible score is "5 + 10 + 15 + 20 + 25 + 30 + 35 (bonus) + 30 + 30 + 25 + 30 + 40 + 50 + 30" which is 375 not 302. The minimum score is 5. In fact a quick set of calculations shows the following statistics based on the different possible scoring outcomes. i.e. assuming there are no bonuses for extra yahtzees, then given the possible scores for each category:

0-4 cannot occur (chance is at least 5)

5 is minimum score

50% of possible scoring outcomes are less than or equal to 184

60% of scores are <= 197

70% of scores are <= 212

75% of scores are <= 220

80% of scores are <= 228

85% of scores are <= 239

90% of scores are <= 252

95% of scores are <= 271

96% of scores are <= 276

97% of scores are <= 283

98% of scores are <= 292

99% of scores are <= 304

99.9% of possible scores are <= 342

The only 100% score = 375

--Alex Farkas 12:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Yathzee valid as full house
Is Yathzee valid as full house? I think it should, for it is valid as 3 and 4 of a kind as well. Many programs are made otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.174.22.39 (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * My recollection is that according to the official rules it isn't. My guess is that it is defined in terms of all five dice matching a set pattern (two different pip values in 3:2 distribution), whereas 3OAK is defined only in terms of having three dice matching a set pattern (such that it doesn't matter what values are on the remaining 2 dice), and similarly for 4OAK.  But I see where you're coming from.  I suppose it only makes a practical difference if you've already scored a Yahtzee and haven't already filled the corresponding upper section box. — Smjg (talk) 02:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Official rules say Yahtzee is not a valid FH ("three of one number and two of another"). Actually, if you're playing the official rules (in particular the Joker rule) it makes absolutely no difference at all. If you've NOT filled the Yahtzee box you'll never put a Yahtzee in the FH box anyway. If you HAVE filled in the Yahtzee box, the Joker rule means that whenever you're allowed to put the Yahtzee on FH you'll score 25 anyway. "I suppose it only makes a practical difference if you've already scored a Yahtzee and haven't already filled the corresponding upper section box." - using the official rules you're not allowed to put the Yahtzee on FH in this situation. Rules say you MUST put it in the Upper Section. If you're playing an unofficial variation where you're allowed to put the Yahtzee on FH in this circumstance (scoring 25) there will be a difference. In particular with 11111 it'd often be better putting in on FH (scoring 25) rather than on 1s (scoring 5), especially if you've got your bonus already. The value of the "Optimal" Strategy increases from 254.59 to 254.61 with this rule change. Nigej (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

RE: Yahtzee valid as full house (correctly spelled : D )
I wrote a game based on Yahtzee and originally my code didn't allow using a Yahtzee as a full house; my math logic didn't incorporate that a pair and a three of a kind could be of the same die face. My original logic scanned the dice to first identify the pair, and then verify the remaining three dice to be of a different die face than the pair. It made sense programatically; however, it was a flaw in my thinking - I would suspect that other programmers have experinced this approach and thus why others don't allow it. For me, it was a bug which I altered, because, the criteria for a full house is to be one pair and three of a kind. Nothing says they cannot be of the same die face.

IMHO lol Torbis Nedrick (talk) 07:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Rules explanation?
I came here looking for the rules, having never played. I'm sure previous authors know a lot about the game. Rules overview - Upper section - Sorry, but incomprehensible to someone like myself, who does not already know the rules. Consider an introduction to the rules for those not already fans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.130.196 (talk) 22:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

+++++NEw Vintage book edition++++ Does any one know about this? A version was released at Target for $20. they sold out but its become some sort of collectors item selling for hundres. The other vintage book games- monopoly etc are not taking this trend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.97.164.124 (talk) 22:32, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

What does Hasbro own? The game or the creator?
I know this might be not significant, but for me the meaning of this phrase is kind of confusing:


 * "Yahtzee is a dice game made by Milton Bradley (now owned by Hasbro)[...]"

Any suggestions for re-phrasing? --imega 23:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imega (talk • contribs)

Maximum score question
If you zeroed out the yahtzee column first, then assumed 5 of a kind for every category - I get 325 for the theoretical maximum score for '0' yahtzees. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semaj187 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Uh, that's not a question.... — Smjg (talk) 22:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Two player strategy
Hi, i wrote a program to compute optimal strategies in yahtzee. For single player, optimizing the expectation value, its optimal, also in optimizing the probability to reach a given threshold. I also implemented a two player strategy, which optimizes the convolution of the probability distributions of both players. It would be great if someone ist interested to run it: http://holderied.de/yahtzee/ Before you can start, the Program needs a night to precompute all possible states. Greetings, Felix — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.167.130.228 (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Update: http://yahtzee.holderied.de/ is a Demo, to show how it works. Greetings, Felix — Preceding unsigned comment added by FelixH (talk • contribs) 09:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

3-bonus max score?
I don't understand how the 3-bonus max score can be 666. By my math: max =  ones      twos     threes     fours     fives     sixes   bonus   3ofKind   4ofKind flHse sStr lStr Yzee  chance    bonusYzee 675 = ((5 * 1) + (5 * 2) + (5 * 3) + (5 * 4) + (5 * 5) + (5 * 6) + 35) + ((5 * 6) + (5 * 6) + 25 + 30 + 40 + 50 + (5 * 6) + (3 * 100)) but my edit was reverted, the comment saying: (Undid revision 628377677 by Supuhstar (talk) 666 seems to be correct - 5x1, 5x2, 5x3, 29 on 3k, 4k, Ch so only 3 bonues) which I can't parse... what does the reversion comment mean, and can anyone show me the flaw in my math? &mdash; Supuhstar * &mdash; 19:53, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Comment should have said: 4x1, 4x2, 4x3, 29 on 3k, 4k, Ch so only 3 bonuses). Your score of 675 would give many more than 3 bonuses, 9 I think. If you want exactly 3 bonuses (no more, no less) you have to get rid of 6 of them. The way to do this (with the smallest reduction in your score) is not to have a "yahtzee" on 1s, 2s, 3s, 3k, 4k and Ch. You can lose just 9 (1+2+3+1+1+1) so score 666. Any higher score will give more than 3 bonuses. Nigej (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Joker rules
The joker rules described here (and indeed, at ) aren't what I remember them being.

The impression this gives is that if you roll a Yahtzee when you have already filled the Yahtzee box on your scoresheet, you must follow set rules about what category you score it under - fill in the upper section box corresponding to the number you rolled 5 of if this is still available, otherwise score it in a lower section box of your choice, or if all these are filled then zero an upper section box of your choice.

I suppose different editions have had slightly different rules. As it happens, I can't seem to find online the rules booklet from the MB edition I grew up with. But in the rules I remember, there are no such restrictions on which box you may fill – the joker is just something that becomes available when you roll a Yahtzee if you have already filled both your Yahtzee box and the relevant upper section box. But if you haven't filled the relevant upper section box, you're still free to score it as 3OAK, 4OAK or Chance, or to zero FH, LS or HS, or to zero one of your upper section boxes (not that you'd ever want to zero a box in this scenario, though you may well want to seize the opportunity to fill your 3OAK or 4OAK). So there is never a restriction on which of your unfilled boxes you may fill at a given time - all that happens is that the combination of Yahtzee on the dice, Yahtzee box already filled and corresponding upper section box already filled means that you can score in FH, LS or HS as if you actually have that combination.

Moreover, if one plays by the compulsory joker rule, then being able to score a Yahtzee as 3OAK or 4OAK might as well be considered part of the joker rule. It would only make a difference in one specific scenario, namely that in which you haven't filled your Yahtzee box yet, and roll a Yahtzee but may decide to score it as 3/4OAK instead. But it is never advantageous to do so.

Does anybody have a copy of the MB rules booklet to confirm? It would be nice if we can improve the article to address differences between different versions of the rules such as this. — Smjg (talk) 12:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Beef-up etymology
Mention what the -zee comes from too, in an all new etymology section. Jidanni (talk) 02:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

"Yahtzee" sounds very similar to "one, two" in Cantonese. "http://www.wikihow.com/Count-from-1-to-10-in-Cantonese"  spells it "yuht, ngee" and if counting quickly, running the words together, it sounds pretty close to "yahtzee." Perhaps a native Cantonese (and English) speaker would offer their opinion. I lived in Hong Kong for 10 years, 50 years ago and am of wide and disparate European/Caucasian stock so I'm no expert. I am aware of the commonly accepted etymology but there could have been Cantonese players in the background influencing the pronunciation of the new name.Ecstatist (talk) 04:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Stupid mistake in upper part example
In the upper part example is a mistake: no-one would put lone 5 in 5 box unless it's the last open and dices just fall that way. But if it's the last one then the one in 4's should have been in 5's. Linkato1 (talk) 05:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * That's an example of a valid combination (and its score), not of an optimal move. Nowhere in the text it's implied that it should be a move that makes tactical sense. klɛz (talk) 09:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Yatzie 1940s
Are there any sources or photographs of the original “Yatzie” game from the 1940s from the National Association Service? Our websites seem to repeat that information but there doesn’t seem to be any source of truth. Charger2 (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I found this https://www.newspapers.com/clip/75981846/shamokin-news-dispatch/ from 1947 which shows there is some truth in it. It is clearly a dice game but it's not clear that it was a version of Yacht. See: https://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-ANTIQUE-FUN-40-Hilarious-Party-Games-National-Association-Service-1942-/324444665238 for a different game "Produced and Distributed by National Association Service of Toledo, Ohio" so that organization clearly existed. Nigej (talk) 06:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

wow thanks for responding. I’ll wait for other possible responses. That’s more than I found. I would love to cite this in the future or amend the history of it warrants it. This is a great start. Thank you Charger2 (talk) 00:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

In Popular Culture Deletion
Given the nature of the content in that particular section and that a cursory search of Yahtzee didn't particularly lend to any significant additions that would make the section more relevant, I took the liberty of deleting the section in its entirety. If someone else finds Yahtzee represented in a film, book or other media, perhaps it would be worthwhile to reintroduce the section then. - Suyibai (talk) 00:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Chance
When can "chance" be used? My understanding is "any time you choose" based on one rule written that said "use when you can't place your final roll in a category (or don't want to). A later version of the game has rules that omit the "or don't want to" which some people interpret as you must use your final roll in any vacant box that is contained in the final roll (no choice to opt out).  I've never played it that way and see this version as a poor translation of the original rule.  Help! 2001:8003:E858:B900:812C:F5F6:E4DB:ED28 (talk) 11:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

What is the source of the probabilities in the strategy section?
The strategy section of the article lists probabilities for a variety of outcomes, but there is no source given for these calculations. Neither is there an explanation for the probability theory used. On the surface, it looks like original unsourced research. I've seen a few explanations on Yahtzee websites, but I am not competent to review them. The same goes for scholarly references. This section in particular looks like it needs the attention of an expert. 84.52.232.43 (talk) 14:19, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Reviews
What is this section? Is there anything encyclopedic here? Are any reliable sources involved? I have perused the cited sources, and found where Yahtzee is mentioned, but I cannot see what I or any other reader might learn from these. Bruce leverett (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The article currently has no Reception section, which is somewhat unusual for such a popular and long-lasting game, so these listed reviews can be used to start a Reception section. BOZ (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not know what a "Reception section" is, but I found WP:RECEPTION, so I'll work from there.
 * That essay says in the first paragraph, "These sections, which often simply list reviewer comments with little organization, make for clunky writing and dull reading."


 * Bingo!
 * Plus, I am not sure it is appropriate to dignify these one-paragraph blurbs from Games by calling them "reviewer comments". They don't have authors' names, for one thing.  I would assume they are just ads paid for by Milton Bradley.  Wikipedia should not be doing Milton Bradley's marketing work for them. Bruce leverett (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * For examples of what Reception sections in tabletop games articles could look like, take a look at Dungeons & Dragons, Magic: The Gathering, Scythe (board game), Hyborian War, and Wingspan (board game), all of which are articles about different types of games that have been improved to WP:FA or WP:GA quality. Yahtzee is a game that easily has enough potential to get an article that high in quality, and I think reviewers for high-quality articles just about expect to see that sort of info in an article; how were the sales, what did critics think, etc. The essay you linked to shows a couple of good examples of how to write a Reception section. BOZ (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I am very impressed by the Reception section of Dungeons & Dragons. This certainly sets a good example.
 * Yahtzee is apparently a very popular game, but I knew nothing about it until I recently made some edit or other that put it on my watch list. I apparently have a steep and long learning curve to write about its reception.  In the mean time, I will try to do something to temporize. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Great! We never stop learning, do we? Happy editing! BOZ (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)