Talk:Yann Martel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 12:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Nice to meet you,, I'll be reviewing this article. It looks (at face value) very close to GA status however I will have to have a look in more detail over the next week or two. It looks like a lot of effort has gone into preparing this high-quality article. may want to contribute as they seem to be doing most of the editing, and as a not it doesn't seem like you have actually edited this article at all - which is not ideal, but if you're happy to respond to my comments during the review not a big problem. --Tom (LT) (talk) 12:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * yes, thanks for pinging, and i will respond. Duckduckstop (talk) 19:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be reviewing against the GA criteria below:

At the present moment, I think we should hold the review for 1-2 weeks while the article stabilises, after which I'll continue the review. I'd love also to hear from the main editor at large,. --Tom (LT) (talk) 12:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Am failing this review based on the neutral and stability criteria. Article is still being extensively edited by an editor who I assume to be Yann Martell, his wife Alice Kuipers, or family or a close friend, based on their extensive edits to those two articles alone. I also can't find any record of edits by the nominator in the last year, which is unusual for a GA review. I suggest renomination in 1-3 months after editing has slowed down and other editors have had a look. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)