Talk:Yated Ne'eman (Israel)

Agudath Israel
Though Agudath Israel of America says that Yated conveys the Aguda view, the newspaper is not affiliated with the Aguda as an organization.--Jms2000 15:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Category anti Zionism?
they are not anti and not pro. its a newspaper for god sake, and they can sometimes be anti and sometimes pro in their opinion pieces representing the normal litvish point of view. this inst a satmar paper. please delete the category.--יודל 14:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * See the quotes. Please provide me some similar quotes of the Yated supporting and praising Zionism. --Eidah 14:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * the quotes are main stream quotes from the ideology of the litvishe judaism if you put al the litvishe stream of judaism and harav shach in this category u have some merit. but why only this page u choose to put into the category? Botom line u cannot take a statement against somebody and make the subject into a category which defines the whole subject. Please don't do that.--יודל 14:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * HAHAHAHAHAHA you make me laugh. You are here and now acknowledging that all of Litvish Judaism is virulently anti-Zionist! I have asked you for something very simple. A minute ago you were saying that "they can sometimes be anti and sometimes pro" and now suddenly "the quotes are main stream quotes from the ideology of the litvishe judaism". HAHAHAHA. Man, please make up your mind, because you don't seem to have the slightest sense of what you are talking about. You are hopelessly and horribly contradicting yourself here.
 * Again, please back up your statement "they can sometimes be anti and sometimes pro" with some examples of the Yated supporting Zionism. --Eidah 14:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * OK let me try to explain, all groups are not defined by their anti sentiments, but by their own sentiments, for instance we don't categorise conservative newspapers anti-liberal although they are littered with such statements. Litvish Judaism is what they are they do not need to be defined by their sometimes anti or sometimes pro Zionism statements because a statement isn't defining the think, its what newspapers do all the time they make statements are those statements who they are? then your list of categories can be longer the the article itself because they had made statements against a lot more thinks then just your singe issue Zionism...--יודל 15:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Yated Ne'eman front page.jpg
Image:Yated Ne'eman front page.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Yated Ne'eman.jpg
Image:Yated Ne'eman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Censorship
I have added information in regard to the photoshopping of a picture published in this paper. I'm sure it will get deleted as Wikipedia like all American media is hell-bent on censoring the truth about Israel. Wikipedia is a 20th century relic that needs to open up to the reality! --84.249.164.59 (talk) 19:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Date in background section
There is a date in a sentence that states "Since December 2016, the Dei'ah Vedibur website has continued offering only limited news coverage and occasional religious content in English." Date is obviously a typo. Thanks. Ucimatty (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Date has been corrected (2006, vs formerly said 2016) Nuts240 (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)