Talk:Yavapai

Looking towards GA
Here are my thoughts on the article's readiness for GA per the criteria, and the issues that would be brought up in a review: Hope that's helpful, if you have any questions feel free to contact me further. Other than those, it basically looks to be GA-class. Best of luck with the nomination! Van Tucky  talk 03:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The article has a lot of very small paragraphs that should probably be consolidated in to larger ones. 3 or 4 sentences should be a minimum paragraph size, never one.
 * Each section or subsection should have at least one inline citation. One for each paragraph would be even better. Just because something doesn't seem like it might be controversial (like their diet), it is still required of GA-class work for the facts in the article to be generally attributed to particular references through citations. If it's a quotation or is possibly controversial, then an inline citation is always required.
 * The format of the references is improper in many instances. A bare url, without title, author, publication date, retrieval date, is unacceptable. If the references section doesn't tell the reader who wrote something, when it was written, etc. then it isn't sufficient verification of reliability. They are not required, but you might consider using an appropriate citation template. It makes providing the necessary info easier.

GA review
I have reviewed this article against the Good article criteria and found the following:


 * [[Image:Crystal button ok.png|20px]] Well written: meets criteria
 * [[Image:Crystal button ok.png|20px]] Factually accurate and verifiable: meets criteria
 * [[Image:Crystal button ok.png|20px]] Broad in its coverage: meets criteria
 * [[Image:Crystal button ok.png|20px]] NPOV: meets criteria
 * [[Image:Crystal button ok.png|20px]] Stable: meets criteria
 * [[Image:Crystal button cancel.png|20px]] Images: All the images are properly licensed, but there's some captioning problems here. Specifically, the image of the bowl having no caption is probably the biggest issue here. Also, captions which aren't a complete sentence shouldn't end in a period.

The image issue is the only problem I see here, so I'm going to apply a hold to the nomination. Just fix it by next Sunday, and I'll be more than happy to pass the article. (You can post to my user talk page when you're done.) —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 00:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Crystal button ok.png|20px]] All right, looks good. Congratulations on a successful GA nom! —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 01:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yavapai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729021017/http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/soldier/sitec1.htm to http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/soldier/sitec1.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729021017/http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/soldier/sitec1.htm to http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/soldier/sitec1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Yavapai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927081112/http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/Planning_and_Renewable_Resources/coop_agencies/new_documents/az.Par.30456.File.dat/arizona_6.pdf to http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/Planning_and_Renewable_Resources/coop_agencies/new_documents/az.Par.30456.File.dat/arizona_6.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110709171818/http://www.itcaonline.com/tribes_campverd.html to http://www.itcaonline.com/tribes_campverd.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ftmcdowell.org/History%20%26%20Culture.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)