Talk:Yebol

Edit warring over tags
There's no edit war here. There's simply no substance to the latter conditions listed. It's all opinion and conjecture by self-appointed Nazis that are overly concerned with fine legalisms. This is an informational site...we're trying to share valuable information and strive for best quality and accuracy therein. Take the time to do some fact checks on your own and you will see how baseless notes like "weasel words" are. (I may just remove this site altogether.) Gregman2 20:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Gregman2

What precisely are such claimed weasel words. The burden of proof should be on he that claims such?;-) I'd really welcome knowing specifics so that things here can be improved CONSTRUCTIVELY.Gregman2 21:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Gregman2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregman2 (talk • contribs)
 * I appreciate your taking the time to discuss this.
 * "we're trying to share valuable information..." Who is "we"?  Sounds like there's a conflict of interest.
 * "Take the time to do some fact checks on your own" That's not how Wikipedia works.  WP:BATTLE states, "Wikipedia is a volunteer community, and does not require its users to give any more time and effort than they wish. Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding more from other users."  It also discusses working cooperative and civilly with others... --Ronz (talk) 00:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The tags are there to identify specific problems and to alert other editors that help may be required to resolve those problems. I'm not sure about the weasel-word and clarification problems, but the notability, primary sources, and news release problems are clear.  If they cannot be resolved, the article should be deleted or stubbed. --Ronz (talk) 00:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)