Talk:Yemaek

Correct the mistakes
Dangun was forged. There were many common-sense mistakes in the "Chinese information Book of Wei" quoted by Legacy of the Three Kingdoms (for example, Yao's ruling time was written wrong, and many mistakes), which showed that Dangun was fake. Besides, we could not find the "Chinese information" quoted by Historical Records of the Three Kingdoms in the Book of Wei!It is also claimed that Wang Shen wrote the book of Wei, but the book of Wei written by Wang Shen was lost before the invention of printing, and Legacy of the Three Kingdoms appeared after the invention of printing. How can the author of this book obtain a lost book?

There is a problem with the reference of No. 13. Yemaek and Joseon are separated in the Historical Records.The original sentence is：诸左方王将居东方，直上谷以往者，东接秽貉、朝鲜. There is punctuation between the words "Yemaek" and "Joseon"

According to the record of the Classic of Mountains and Seascan be knew, Yemaek and Joseon were not the same thing

《山海经·海内西经》载:"貊国在汉水东北，地近燕，灭之"燕以其地置二龙湖古城"

It is desirable to replace the contents below with citations of other contents.
According to iGENEA, a leading European genealogy service, their current research suggests that "modern Koreans are descended from the Tungus tribe of the Yemaek people."

The Korean historical community does not classify the Yemaek tribe as Tungusic peoples, but as a northern ancestor and independent tribe of modern Koreans. The reason is that this theory is related to Man-Seon Sagwan (滿鮮史觀), a view of history since the 20th century that distinguishes Manchuria and the Korean Peninsula in Japan. This theory is regarded as a theory that denies the long-held historical awareness of Koreans and divides Koreans.