Talk:Yes! Weekly

I'm inclined to remove
I'm inclined to agree with the now blocked paid/organisational account (about removing the latter paragraph about departing editors starting up a new section). Obviously not because they don't want it, but I do think it's only got about 10 words linking it specifically to Yes! Weekly in the source, and it's both UNDUE and doesn't really inform us about Yes! Weekly.

It's right that it's in the Triad City Beat article, but I don't feel it belongs here. - thoughts otherwise? Nosebagbear (talk) 13:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * After looking at it, I agree with you . It's definitely more relevant for the Triad City Beat article to link here than the other way around. Lcodyh803 (talk) 15:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Nosebagbear, I'm fine with whatever you think is right. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Cheers both, I'll remove it Nosebagbear (talk)