Talk:YesAsia

YesAsia
This article is really a mess. It is essentially advertising for YesAsia, and is full of unfounded claims, and weaselly language related to legal threats from Disney. There also seems to be somebody associated with YesAsia (Gh87) who feels it's his job to revert edits to this page and to shill for YesAsia in the talk page. -- Anon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2007

Has anyone noticed that YesAsia resembles Amazon in several ways? That includes the shipping deals, the layout of the page, and the type of content sold? It is almost bordering on trademark infringment? -- Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.219.180.138 (talk) 03:44, 2 February 2006
 * Is it just me, or do your considerations have a POV? Sorry, but I'm not sure which came first to re-develop, Amazon or Yesasia (formerly AsiaCD)? Is there more evidence to support your argument, even when we're not sure how and when Amazon and YesAsia re-developed their sites and pages in a well-organized, classy, bold way? -- Gh87 10:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Removal of my YAE link
There is a wholly owned subsidiary of YesAsia called YAE (YesAsia Entertainment) that YesAsia seems to want to deny association with, even going so far as to change the registration info of their domain recently to hide the association. Running a "traceroute" on www.yaentertainment.com still shows that it is served from within the yesasia.com private network. Why they would want to disassociate themselves at all is a mystery!!

See the discussion here: http://www.d-addicts.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=841715#841715 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 17:18, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Sources and copy edit
Although another editor just tagged this for primary sources, I can't see a problem. Bloomberg is WP:RS. Internet Retailer seems to be under independent editorial control, not just printing press releases. As for the copy edit tag, a recent contributor just made some minor changes and it seems fine to me. – Fayenatic (talk) 19:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)