Talk:Yesterday's Wine/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * Hi, sorry, but this entry is straight up WEIRD. sounds like creative writing turned encyclopedic gone wrong. love the album more than most anything though. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.117.120.24 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "hadvast" seems to be a typo; I think it should be "vast", but that doesn't make sense, too.
 * Corrected.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   15:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Is Ref 4 and 6 the references for the full "Concept" section? Can you do the same shortcut-formatting like in Phases and Stages?
 * I added two more references for the other two paragraphs. Refs now with shortcuts-- GD uwen    Tell me!   15:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * ISBN check: ok
 * Dabsolver check: fixed 2 links
 * Checklinks check: ok
 * Reflinks check: -
 * On hold until you fix the issues.-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 11:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass another great article!-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 17:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)